decodedscience
  • オンラインカジノ
  • 私たちについて

New Caledonia, Iceland and Oklahoma: Earthquakes 16-22 November 2017

November 22, 2017 by Jennifer Young 1 Comment

Share13
+1
Share
Pin
Tweet
Shares 13
The map shows earthquakes from 16-22 November 2017

The map shows earthquakes from 16-22 November 2017. Image by USGS.

There was a lot going on in the week of 16-22 November, 2017, most of it in the western Pacific. The United states Geological Survey’s real time earthquake map, which records tremors of all magnitudes in the US and its territories and those of at least magnitude 4 (≥M4.0) elsewhere, showed almost 1800 earthquakes for the period across the globe.

Of these, six were at least M6.0 with one reaching M7.0, and 52 reached a magnitude of at least M5.0. This is unusual but not unprecedented, and is explained (as such high numbers often are) by an ongoing series of foreshocks and aftershocks in one sequence — in this case, in New Caledonia.

The New Caledonia earthquake series accounted for 49 of the 125 earthquakes of at least M4.5 and over half of those reaching M5.0. It also included five of the six reaching M5.0 — so it’s hardly surprising that the numbers are skewed.

If we take this out, seismic activity was relatively limited, with nothing significant beyond the usual smattering of earthquakes around the western rim of the Pacific Ocean.

The Week’s Biggest Earthquake: M7.0, New Caledonia

The ongoing earthquake series in New Caledonia produced an earthquake of M7.0 this week

The ongoing earthquake series in New Caledonia produced an earthquake of M7.0 this week. Image by USGS.

It’s probably simplest to discuss the New Caledonia earthquake series as a whole, rather than just the M7.0 which is the largest of the series so far — and the series has been going on for rather longer than the one week covered in this digest.

Firstly, let’s outline the tectonic context. In this area the westwards-moving Australian plate descends beneath the Pacific plate, along the South New Hebrides Trench, and it’s along a relatively short area of this trench that the earthquake series is concentrated.

If the context sounds familiar, it’s because I wrote about it a couple of weeks ago, describing an M6.8 earthquake which occurred just on the Pacific side of the margin and which was probably a subduction earthquake. This earthquake was followed by many others (121 are recorded on the map for the last 30 days) of which eight were of at least M6.0.

By definition, the mainshock in any series is the largest, regardless of where in the series it occurs, which makes this week’s M7.0 earthquake the most significant. Looking back, however, we see that the initial M6.8 seems to have been the initiating earthquake at the subduction zone and those which followed it — mostly on the other side of the margin and with an extensional component to them — are actually the result of the crust adjusting to the main ‘quake.

The earthquake series has been going on since the end of October and may not be over; but I would hazard a guess that most subsequent activity will also be crust deformation in response to the initial subduction ‘quake.

Earthquakes in Iceland

Iceland's earthquakes are too small to appear on the map, but they're significant nonetheless

Iceland’s earthquakes are too small to appear on the map, but they’re significant nonetheless. Image by USGS.

I’ve talked a lot about earthquakes in Iceland and their potential role as indicators of a further volcanic eruption. This fascinates me because a volcanic eruption in Iceland has the potential to cause enormous disruption on a regional scale and shouldn’t be ignored.

One of the less well known of Iceland’s volcanoes, Öræfajökull, has been rumbling recently — not at high magnitudes, but at significant levels. By significant, I mean that in a typical year seismologists record around 125 earthquakes and this year there have been over 500, with around 150 in the past month alone.

Of course, earthquakes don’t necessarily imply volcanic activity, but they can — and history tells us that we have good reasons to be very wary of Öræfajökull. It doesn’t erupt often but two of its known eruptions, in 1362 and 1727, have been significant and, if repeated today, would have significant implications for local residents and possibly for air travellers. And that’s why a lot of respected volcanologists are paying it a lot of attention.

US Earthquakes: All is Quiet

Is the earthquake swarm in Oklahoma calming down?

Is the earthquake swarm in Oklahoma calming down? Image by USGS.

All right — all isn’t entirely quiet in the US, seismologically speaking, but there certainly isn’t anything that stands out on the USGS map this week. With that in mind, it’s always worth going back to look at what isn’t happening and wondering why.

It’s been a while since we looked at Oklahoma, where there’s been a long-lasting swarm of earthquakes resulting from the injection of waste water deep into the ground. There was a point where I was commenting on on this almost on a weekly basis, with dozens of minor tremors appearing on the map.

This week there are 19 of them, the largest coming in at M3.7. I’m not fully au fait with any local regulations on fracking in Oklahoma, and I’m always conscious that the USGS under-reports its smaller earthquakes, so that the full extent of the tremors, especially the smaller ones, isn’t always clear. That said, I’m an optimist — and I cherish the hope that it may be human action that has mitigated the extent of these tremors, just as it was human action that caused them.

Last Thoughts: What Lies Ahead

If you have an eye for an apocalyptic headline, you might appreciate this from the UK’s Daily Star: “Earthquakes in 2018 could kill BILLIONS as Earth slows on axis”. If you prefer a more measured approach, I can offer you The Guardian: “Upsurge in big earthquakes predicted for 2018 as Earth rotation slows”.

The source for these stories is a paper presented at the Geological Society of America’s annual meeting, in which two seismologists proposed the theory that changes in the Earth’s rotation might lead to an increase in major earthquakes in 2018. The Guardian quoted the report’s co-author, Roger Balham, as saying: “The correlation between Earth’s rotation and earthquake activity is strong and suggests there is going to be an increase in numbers of intense earthquakes next year” (2018).

It’s worth pointing out that the analysis is a purely statistical one and we’ve often noted that there’s considerable variation in earthquake activity anyway. And there’s no indication of where and when such earthquakes might occur. But as theories go, it’s certainly one worth keeping an eye on.

© Copyright 2017 Jennifer Young, All rights Reserved. Written For: Decoded Science
Share13
+1
Share
Pin
Tweet
Shares 13

Filed Under: Geology, Headlines, Weekly Features

Resources for this article

The Guardian online. Upsurge in big earthquakes predicted for 2018 as Earth rotation slows. (2017). Accessed on November 22, 2017


Futurevolc. Catalogue of Icelandic Volcanoes. (2017). Accessed on November 22, 2017


United States Geological Survey. M 7.0 – 86km ENE of Tadine, New Caledonia. (2017). Accessed on November 22, 2017


United States Geological Survey. Real time earthquake map and archive. (2017). Accessed on November 22, 2017




Decoded Everything is a non-profit corporation, dependent on donations from readers like you. Donate now! Your support keeps the great information coming!

Donation Information

I would like to make a donation in the amount of:

 $500 $200 $100 $50 $20 $10 $5 Other
Other:

I would like this donation to automatically repeat each month

Tribute Gift

Check here to donate in honor or memory of someone
Check here if this is a memorial gift
Name of person to be honored:
Send acknowledgement via email
Send acknowledgement via postal mail
Email Name:
Email:
Name:
Address:
City:
State :
Province:
Country:
Postal Code:

Donor Information

First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Please do not display my name publicly. I would like to remain anonymous
Add me to your mailing list

Comments

  1. Cat Fifer says

    November 22, 2017 at 12:58 pm

    Can you tell me why there is no activity on the De Fuca fault off the Oregon coast? With all the other activity going on both to the north and south of Oregon, why is it so quiet here? And can you tell me how far inland the subduction zone is in Oregon? Thank you.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Connect with:
Facebook

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About the Author

Jennifer Young

Jennifer Young gained an Honours degree in Geography from Edinburgh University, where her studies included a range of topics in both physical and environmental geography. She subsequently undertook and completed a BSc in … Read Full Profile

Follow Decoded Science

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
signupheredailydosedecsciv2


Science Everyone’s Talking About

  • Superfund Site Nelson County VA: Blue Rock, Titanium, and Intrigue A superfund site? Sometimes nature, coupled with man’s… under Geoscience, Natural Disasters
  • Dog Circovirus: How Concerned Should Dog Owners Be? Dog circovirus – a virus found in many dogs who died la… under Headlines, Veterinary Science
  • Weather Around The World, 12/3/17 Hurricane season is over, and winter is bringing a chil… under Headlines, Meteorology
  • Gay-Straight Alliances and High School Suicide Rates New research finds that Gay-Straight alliances help kid… under Headlines, Sociology
  • Getting Sick? Know the Difference Between Cold, Flu, and H1N1 When you get sick, how can you tell whether you’ve got… under Headlines, Health

Today’s Most Popular Science Articles

  • Genetically Modified Organisms: Pros and Cons of GMO Food
  • Cross Multiply to Solve Equations with Fractions
  • Introducing Math Symbols for Union and Intersection
  • Which Chemical Bond is Stronger: Ionic vs. Covalent Bonds
  • Stomach Flu Cramps: Is There Anything You Can Do For Norovirus Symptoms?
  • Organ Harvesting, Human Trafficking, and the Black Market
  • Practical Uses of Matrix Mathematics

© 2026 DecodedScience

MENU
  • Home
  • Headlines
  • General Science
  • Applied Science
    • Calculations
    • Economics
    • Engineering
      • Aviation
      • Civil Engineering
    • Medical Science
      • Health
      • Neuroscience
      • Oncology
      • Veterinary Science
    • Political Science
      • Polling
    • Mathematics
    • Technology
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Computing
      • Electronics
      • Gadgets
    • Social Science
      • Cognitive Science
      • Psychology
      • Sociology
      • Anthropology
        • Linguistics
  • Physical Science
    • Archaeology
    • Astronomy
    • Chemistry
      • Materials Science
    • Geoscience
      • Climate Change
      • The Environment
      • Geology
      • Meteorology
      • Oceanography
    • Life Science
      • Biology
        • Botany
        • Zoology
          • Marine Biology
          • Entomology
          • Microbiology
        • Paleontology
        • Ecology
    • Nuclear Science
  • Theoretical Science
    • Physics
    • Math Theory
  • About Us
    • Contact Decoded Science
    • Ask the Expert
    • Meet Our Experts
    • Meet Our Sponsors:
    • Browse All Articles
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use Agreement
  • Support Decoded Science