Decoded Science

  • Home
  • Headlines
  • General Science
  • Applied Science
    • Calculations
    • Economics
    • Engineering
      • Aviation
      • Civil Engineering
    • Medical Science
      • Health
      • Neuroscience
      • Oncology
      • Veterinary Science
    • Political Science
      • Polling
    • Mathematics
    • Technology
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Computing
      • Electronics
      • Gadgets
    • Social Science
      • Cognitive Science
      • Psychology
      • Sociology
      • Anthropology
        • Linguistics
  • Physical Science
    • Archaeology
    • Astronomy
    • Chemistry
      • Materials Science
    • Geoscience
      • Climate Change
      • The Environment
      • Geology
      • Meteorology
      • Oceanography
    • Life Science
      • Biology
        • Botany
        • Zoology
          • Marine Biology
          • Entomology
          • Microbiology
        • Paleontology
        • Ecology
    • Nuclear Science
  • Theoretical Science
    • Physics
    • Math Theory
  • About Us
    • Contact Decoded Science
    • Ask the Expert
    • Meet Our Experts
    • Meet Our Sponsors:
    • Browse All Articles
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use Agreement
  • Support Decoded Science

Global Warming Simplified: Climate Change, Timescales, and Statistics

September 17, 2014 by Jon Plotkin 13 Comments

Share96
Share4
+13
Tweet
Pin
103 Shares
yearly  temperature anomaly chart

The yearly temperature anomaly for the last 150 years from two sources: US National Climate Data Center and UK Climate Research Unit. Courtesy of NOAA

There is no dispute among knowledgeable and unbiased scientists that climate change is occurring.

Why, then, is there still ambivalence on the part of the public about how to respond?

Partly it’s because there are powerful vested interests determined to obfuscate the obvious; partly it’s because it can be difficult to sort out fact from fiction.

Debates tend to devolve into a shouting match between the extremes of the political and economic spectrum. Science can get lost in the cacophony.

Here’s what comes out when the subject of global warming/climate change is broken apart and simplified.

Just The Facts, Ma’m

The long and short of it is that the temperature of the atmosphere is a degree (F) warmer than it was a hundred years ago, and the ocean is a foot higher.

Burning coal, oil, and natural gas — fossil fuels — releases carbon dioxide.




Models of the atmosphere which incorporate increasing amounts of carbon dioxide predict precisely the results we observe: Higher temeperatures on a global average, greater persistence of weather patterns, (Remember the Omega Block that wouldn’t leave?) and more weather extremes such as unseasonable cold snaps this September.

The convergence of theory and observation leaves virtually every impartial earth scientist convinced of the reality of climate change caused primarily by the burning of fossil fuels.

Atmospheric carbon dioxide record for the last 400,000 years

Atmospheric carbon dioxide record for the last 400,000 years, courtesy of NASA

Look Over There!

Powerful corporations, which have an interest in continuing quarter-to-quarter profits regardless of the consequences, have used disingenuous and downright dishonest tactics to obscure the clear harm that their activities are doing to the planet.

Statistics can be used to show virtually anything, and in this case it is easy to muddy the clear waters of truth.

The Scale Of Climate Change

The earth has, at times in the past, been both colder and warmer than it is today.

This fact is used by climate-change deniers to argue that the recent temperature changes are a result of natural cycles. Unfortunately, this is an inaccurate comparison, as natural climate cycles take tens of thousands of years at the least.

The recent change in temperature of the atmosphere-ocean system is unprecedented. In a thousand years, the temperature will rise ten degrees at the current rate of increase (which itself has been increasing). Such an increase has never happened in less than ten thousand years.

Climate Change: Here’s An Example Of The Misuse Of Statistics

Suppose you have a theory that because of the orbit and inclination of the earth relative to the equatorial plane, the temperature will rise during the spring in the northern hemisphere. Now let’s look at the observations. Every year the temperature rises between the beginning of April and the end of the month.

Now suppose someone wants to make the case that the temperature actually falls in April. He can point to the temperature record for almost any day between 8 p.m. and 5 a.m. During the night, the temperature almost always falls. The same kind of chicanery is going on with the citing of temperature records by those who disagree with the theory of manmade climate change.

1998 was an exceptionally warm year. In fact, it was the warmest year on record (2014 is on track to surpass it) due to a very powerful El Niño. Interestingly, those who disagree with the climate change theory seem to inevitably start their measurement of temperature change with 1998. That way, whatever period of time they use, the temperature appears to be falling.

In fact, a properly smoothed temperature graph from the start of the industrial revolution to the present shows an unabated rise, just as a properly smoothed record of April temperatures shows a steady rise.

Short Term Fluctuations In The Earth-Atmosphere System

Temperatures fluctuate. There are well-defined periods, such as daily or yearly; and there are less certain ones, such as El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO). As long as nay-sayers can pick their spots and start their temperature record where they choose, or truncate it wherever they like, there will be data presented that paints a distorted picture of the temperature trend over the most recent century.

The Future of The Climate

Maybe all the scientists are wrong. It’s not likely, but it has happened before. Nevertheless, there is grave danger in ignoring what the climate is telling us.

The fact is that the general circulation of the atmosphere is not well understood. What we do know is that the climate has been very different in the past. Of its own accord, the climate would indeed change very substantially — but over many millennia. Humanity has now begun a process that is without precedent in climatic history, and which could spiral out of control in a short time.

Share96
Share4
+13
Tweet
Pin
103 Shares

Filed Under: Climate Change, Headlines

Resources for this article

NASA. How is Today's Warming Different fromt he Past?. (2014). Accessed on September 17, 2014


NOAA. Global Temperature Trends: 2013 Summary. (2014). Accessed on September 17, 2014


NOAA. Maps & Data. (2014). Accessed on September 17, 2014


NOAA. The Instrumental Record of Past Global Temperatures. (2014). Accessed on September 17, 2014




Decoded Everything is a non-profit corporation, dependent on donations from readers like you. Donate now! Your support keeps the great information coming!

Donation Information

I would like to make a donation in the amount of:

$500$200$100$50$20$10$5Other
Other:

I would like this donation to automatically repeat each month

Tribute Gift

Check here to donate in honor or memory of someone
Check here if this is a memorial gift
Name of person to be honored:
Send acknowledgement via email
Send acknowledgement via postal mail
Email Name:
Email:
Name:
Address:
City:
State :
Province:
Country:
Postal Code:

Donor Information

First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Please do not display my name publicly. I would like to remain anonymous
Add me to your mailing list

Comments

  1. Vincent Summers says

    April 24, 2016 at 6:08 am

    Oh, I meant to add… On the topic of fuels, which fuel do you think releases the most CO2 to the atmosphere for the quantity of heat produced? You might not believe the answer. So check my data: http://www.quirkyscience.com/maximize-carbon-dioxide-greenhouse-gas-production/

    And as for non-fuel additions, the Smithsonian magazine wrote on the topic of “green cement” and its contribution of approximately 5% of the whole world’s CO2. It sounds wrong at first, but if you check out the chemistry, you’ll realize it makes sense: http://www.quirkyscience.com/cement-production-aggravates-carbon-dioxide-levels/

    Reply
  2. Vincent Summers says

    April 24, 2016 at 5:55 am

    If you really want to compare calm presentation of the facts with silly outbursts of nonsense, just view the comments written before this one. It becomes obvious what is said about obfuscation is true.

    Reply
  3. WHR Ding says

    October 1, 2014 at 10:47 am

    Yes climate change is always occurring but major changes have occurred over short time spans. It’s not only millenia. What about the Medieval Warm Period? C02 certainly wasn’t to blame then. Oh yes and there’s always mention of decreasing arctic ice. Where’s the mention of the increasing antarctic ice? As for statistics being selectively chosen by deniers, so it with the extremists. In fact the “climate-gate” emails clearly show attempts at suppressing the release of data or the methods involved so that true scientific inquiry is compromised.

    So much is still unknown about overall climate dynamics. Pinning so much on CO2 sounds good, but it doesn’t work. When all existing models fail to predict the lack of global temperature rise for almost 20 years now, in the face of rising CO2 levels something is wrong. Allowing the rigors of open-minded and true scientific inquiry to proceed is what is needed. It ain’t happening enough right now.

    Reply
  4. Kenneth Gustafson says

    September 29, 2014 at 10:55 am

    I don’t think it’s true that there is no dispute among scientists that “man made” global warming is occurring. My geology texts show that for 12k yrs we have been emerging from an Ice Age” (the 4th in the last 1mm yrs) & that we are not much more than half way into the next 300k yr inter-glacial period. Earth has only lost a little more tan a 1/2 of its’ anticipated glacial loss. It has been assumed for some time that the total loss will have significant effects on earth’s climate and ocean levels and that this will occur regardless of human activities. I don’t believe that geologists and archaeologists agree that we are responsible for global warming.. Perhaps there is consensus among meteorologists but that consensus is limited this scuence.

    Reply
  5. N/A says

    September 19, 2014 at 8:54 am

    you are kidding really! wake up this has been happening for billions <—-(laughing) of years

    Reply
  6. Darla Sue Dollman says

    September 18, 2014 at 11:41 am

    This explanation is so clear and simple I wish teachers would distribute it in schools. It’s the politicians that need the explanation, though!

    Reply
  7. Jon Plotkin says

    September 18, 2014 at 10:41 am

    Frank, I have mentioned how greenhouse gases affect the atmosphere several times: CO2 and methane are transparent to solar radiation, but opaque to the earth’s microwave radiation. The heat gets let in but not out. If Victoria commands that that be stated in 500 words or more, it will be done.

    Reply
  8. Ira Mark Egdall says

    September 17, 2014 at 3:18 pm

    An easy-to-read and well reasoned article. It is the last sentence which I find most alarming.

    Reply
    • Curt says

      September 22, 2014 at 8:55 pm

      The only alarming aspect is that he makes this claim using 150 years of data. May as well describe the moon using one inch of topography for evidence.

      Reply
  9. Dave says

    September 17, 2014 at 11:36 am

    All this is true, to the fact that statistics can be bent ANY way. Why start at 1850 ‘the beginning of the industrial revolution’. That’s the same as using 1998 as a comparison since, as data shows, the Little Ice Age ran from around 1300-1850. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age. Interesting to peg the graphs starting at 1850?

    Climate changes, all the time, over time. Many factors affect climate. The problem is the impact of those factors. Solar variations have a much more profound affect than any man/human affect. Similarly, local volcanic activity (ie Mt Pinatubo in the 1980s) can have widespread global impact, even if for a short period, that completely counteract against ‘150 years of man-made global warming’.

    A simple question: IF you eliminated ALL human activity from the planet, just what WOULD be the climate?

    Reply
    • Curt says

      September 22, 2014 at 8:56 pm

      Ice age? The Earth has been warming since the last one.

      Reply
  10. Frank Parker says

    September 17, 2014 at 11:29 am

    Good to see the phenomenon explained in such simple terms, Jon. But then, that;s what we have come to expect from Decoded! I would like to see a follow up article explaining the mechanism (the way CO2 and other hydro-carbon gases provide an insulating blanket to reduce heat loss over night and in winter and the thicker blanket that has developed over the last 100 years has proved to be too much of a good thing – like using a winter weight quilt in summer!)

    Reply
    • Jon Plotkin says

      September 18, 2014 at 10:35 am

      Well, Dave, consider the time scales. You can start with 1850, 1900, 1950. The temperature goes up and the CO2 goes up — both at unprecedented rates. As for your last question, we know for sure that there would be no city heat islands; there would be no narrowing of day/night temperature range because of contrails. If you are suggesting that burning fossil fuels has had no effect on the climate, I think you’re, as they say, spitting into the wind.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Connect with:
Facebook

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

About the Author

Jon Plotkin

Earth and Space Scientist Jon Plotkin holds an Master of Science in meteorology from MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) and a Bachelor of Arts in Math from Cornell University. Jon has used his meteorology experience ... Read Full Profile

Follow Decoded Science

  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
signupheredailydosedecsciv2


Science Everyone's Talking About

  • Effects of Poor Sleep: Increased Bickering with Your Partner Effects of Poor Sleep: Increased Bickering with Your Partner New research shows that not only can poor sleep habits... under Headlines, Social Science
  • Air Conditioning and Pressurization Systems in Modern Aircraft Air Conditioning and Pressurization Systems in Modern Aircraft For any modern aircraft to fly at high altitudes, i... under Aviation
  • Martian Water, Vanishing Arctic Ice and Mediterranean Tsunami Risk: Geoscience 6-13 February 2019 Martian Water, Vanishing Arctic Ice and Mediterranean Tsunami Risk: Geoscience 6-13 February 2019 This week's articles include the case for liquid water... under Geoscience, Headlines, Weekly Features
  • Introducing the Factorial: the Exclamation Mark of Math Introducing the Factorial: the Exclamation Mark of Math What is a factorial, and how is the exclamation point u... under Math Theory
  • Did the Temple of Solomon Define Pi in the Bible? Did the Temple of Solomon Define Pi in the Bible? King Solomon's temple featured a 'Molten Sea' that incl... under Calculations, Headlines

Today's Most Popular Science Articles

  • Introducing Math Symbols for Union and Intersection Introducing Math Symbols for Union and Intersection
  • Genetically Modified Organisms: Pros and Cons of GMO Food Genetically Modified Organisms: Pros and Cons of GMO Food
  • Which Chemical Bond is Stronger: Ionic vs. Covalent Bonds Which Chemical Bond is Stronger: Ionic vs. Covalent Bonds
  • Norovirus Facts: 5 Things You Didn't Know About Stomach Flu Norovirus Facts: 5 Things You Didn’t Know About Stomach Flu
  • Cross Multiply to Solve Equations with Fractions Cross Multiply to Solve Equations with Fractions
  • Introducing the Factorial: the Exclamation Mark of Math Introducing the Factorial: the Exclamation Mark of Math
  • Stomach Flu Cramps: Is There Anything You Can Do For Norovirus Symptoms? Stomach Flu Cramps: Is There Anything You Can Do For Norovirus Symptoms?

Copyright © 2019 · Magazine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

MENU
  • Home
  • Headlines
  • General Science
  • Applied Science
    • Calculations
    • Economics
    • Engineering
      • Aviation
      • Civil Engineering
    • Medical Science
      • Health
      • Neuroscience
      • Oncology
      • Veterinary Science
    • Political Science
      • Polling
    • Mathematics
    • Technology
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Computing
      • Electronics
      • Gadgets
    • Social Science
      • Cognitive Science
      • Psychology
      • Sociology
      • Anthropology
        • Linguistics
  • Physical Science
    • Archaeology
    • Astronomy
    • Chemistry
      • Materials Science
    • Geoscience
      • Climate Change
      • The Environment
      • Geology
      • Meteorology
      • Oceanography
    • Life Science
      • Biology
        • Botany
        • Zoology
          • Marine Biology
          • Entomology
          • Microbiology
        • Paleontology
        • Ecology
    • Nuclear Science
  • Theoretical Science
    • Physics
    • Math Theory
  • About Us
    • Contact Decoded Science
    • Ask the Expert
    • Meet Our Experts
    • Meet Our Sponsors:
    • Browse All Articles
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of Use Agreement
  • Support Decoded Science