Winning Powerball Tickets in Arizona and Missouri: How to Calculate the (Slim) Odds

Do you have a Powerball Ticket? Image by Upupa4me

The winning Powerball tickets were sold in Arizona and Missouri – if you didn’t win, you may be kicking yourself for wasting money on a ticket, but the odds of winning are always better if you buy in.

What are those odds, anyway, and how do we calculate them?

Calculating the Powerball Odds

It’s easy to learn the poor odds of becoming incredibly wealthy by winning the Powerball lottery, but just how do they calculate the odds of winning the ultimate get-rich-quick scheme?

The current rules for a Powerball lotto’s grand prize win are fairly simple. The winning ticket must predict the values of five white balls chosen without replacement from a group of 59, and also predict the value of one red ball chosen from a group of 35.

The official Powerball site gives the probability of winning the $2 play as “1 in 175,223,510” to match all 5 white plus 1 red ball.

Would you like to see more articles like this?
Support This Expert's Articles, This Category of Articles, or the Site in General Here.
Just put your preference in the "I Would Like to Support" Box after you Click to Donate Below:


They don’t show how they calculate the number of possible draw combinations:

  • There are ( (59*58*57*56*55)*35 )/ (5!) = ( (59*58*57*56*55)*35 )/ (5*4*3*2*1)  combinations.
  • According to my computer’s calculator, this equation equals 175,223,510.

The probability of winning is therefore one out of all the possible combinations, or 1/175,223,510.

What does this calculation of combinations mean?

The Formula for the Probability of a Lucky Draw in a Lottery

The general  formula for the number of combinations when drawing ‘m‘ correct items from a set of ‘n‘, without replacement and regardless of the order, is:

C = n*(n – 1)*(n – 2)*…(n – m – 1)/(m!), where…

  • ‘C’ is the number of combinations;
  • ‘n’ is the number of items in the set;
  • ‘m’ is the number of items to be selected.

So we have ‘n’ choices for the first item, but only (n-1) choices for the second selection. Why? We’ve already taken away one item.

When we take away the m-th item, there are only (m – 1) items remaining for the selection. Thus the second factor is (m-1). This continues until all  ‘m’ factors have been multiplied together.

Then we divide by “m!”, or “m factorial”, which was discussed in “Introducing the Factorial: the Exclamation Mark of Math“.

The  five white balls in Powerball count down from 59 through 55 and the “5!” divisor in the main calculation. The number 35 accounts for the solitary red ball.

Click to Read Page Two: Simple Example of Lottery Probability

© Copyright 2012 Mike DeHaan, All rights Reserved. Written For: Decoded Science
Decoded Everything is a non-profit corporation, dependent on donations from readers like you. Donate now! Your support keeps the great information coming!


  1. Jim says

    Not one with a math background I ask the following question; what are the odds of winning both the Mega Millions and PowerBall back to back? A question that arose out of my statement to a friend’s question that it had to be the billions or trillions to one, to which he said no way.

    This formula works well for each separately using MS-Excell:

    Powerball-175,223510/1 odds using (combin(59,5)*35) as the formula
    Mega Millions-258,890,850/1 odds using (combin(75,5)*15) as the formula

  2. brett says

    Great explanation. Shockingly, those precise odds are actually printed on the back of the ticket, too!
    The lottery used to be called the “stupidity tax” until the Power/MegaBall era, where the pot is rolled over. In that case, you can have a non-negative expected value ticket provided the pot exceeds the denominator, i.e., $175m. However, i think it’s still hard to determine the true odds in an event like this week because you don’t know how many tickets are outstanding.

  3. Mike DeHaanMike DeHaan says

    Thanks for the kinds remarks and especially for all the corrections. I’d thought I’d fixed the “35 not 39″, which started with Turpin; did Powerball change the number of red balls at some point? Nonetheless, that’s my faulty midnight proof-reading to blame.
    Many noticed that I ignored [a] taxes and [b] “annuitized value to a single winner”, when calculating an economic break-even point. Again it’s “mea culpa” for allowing my Canadian complacency about full & immediate, tax-free payout from other lotteries such as Lotto Max or the 6/49 lottery to blind me to American realties.
    Again, thanks much, and I hope to improve.

  4. says

    This analysis is fine as far as it goes, but it is incomplete. Since a player must buy a ticket with after-tax cash, the calculation should be based on after-tax cash payout. Given that Pwerball sets the cash payout at half of the prize, and assuming 43% taxes (federal, state, local), the prize would need to be $1,168,156,733 ($350,447,020 times 2 divided by .6) for this to be a rational gamble.

  5. bliddel says

    The odds of selecting the winning number are easy to calculate. The value of an entry in a raffle are easy to caluclate: Odds of winning, times the value of the prize awarded. The value of a ticket in a paramutual lottery are much harder to calculate. Even when one makes educated assumptions about the estimated payout and the number of entries people will purchase, the complexity of the problem exceeds the reach of most actuarial students, and I know several Fellows in the Society of Actuaries who don’t want to tackle this question either.

  6. J.S. says

    One thing that always goes unnoticed by most news outlets about this jackpot is that the advertised amount is the estimated “annuitized value to a single winner”. (Annuitized meaning paid out over the next 30 years.) Since there were 2 perfect tickets sold, the prize would be split between the two tickets. Even if there was only 1 perfect ticket, if the winners decided to take their share of the prize in a lump sum, that value would be about only 60% of the advertised jackpot, before taxes.

  7. Andres says

    The authar has a typo in calc – ” There are ( (59*58*57*56*55)*39 )/ (5!) = ( (59*58*57*56*55)*35 )/ (5*4*3*2*1)
    In the first calc the 39 should be a 35, as seen on the right hand side

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *